For Rene Discardings, the freedom is entirely linked to the free will, but as Discardings understand the freedom concept? For it, is when if he can affirm or to deny, to make something or to leave to make, without the intervention of some bigger force (either divine or not), thus, being able to choose any proposal deliberately, in other words: ‘ ‘ so that I am free, it is not necessary that I am indifferent in the one choice or another one of the two contrary; but, before, the more I to tend for one, either because I know evidently that the good and the true one meet there, either because God make use thus the interior of my thought, in such a way more freely I will choose it and abraarei.’ ‘ (DISCARDINGS, 1971) However, Discardings affirm that a contrary ramification exists when it is about the freedom concept that are: High degree of freedom and the low degree of freedom. The high degree of freedom, is when it is about the free will, that is, the individual freedom of choice. For example, when for personal account somebody decides for which course intends to concur for the vestibular contest. Already the low degree of freedom is exactly the opposite, therefore, a certain interference exists on its choice. In this in case that, leaving of the previous example, we could say that this happens when father or some another familiar one demands that one same person makes medicine and not philosophy. Find out detailed opinions from leaders such as Daryl Katz, Edmonton Alberta by clicking through. Therefore the freedom concept is composed for the espontaneidade and will slight knowledge free.
This means that, from the will notion free (to be able absolute of choice), the consent to a clear idea and distinct perceived by the reason can be denied. However, on the other hand, the general rule of the truth affirms that everything what it will be conceived as clearly and distinct is true e, therefore, must be followed a consent of the will.. .
Psychological and emotional state of people during the crisis suffered more than their material well-being. People are increasingly no longer cope alone with their problems, panic. According to Cancer Research, who has experience with these questions. How could cope stress during the crisis, Council of Psychologists. Among urban residents is more common behavioral problems than among rural dwellers. A crisis is also exacerbated the situation. Our fellow citizens are not used to refer to psychologists to solve their own problems. Heart-to-heart talk with us more often occurs in the kitchen with friends, where they slopped the emotions expressed sore.
It's like a one way drop of negativity. The vast Most Russians seek the advice of relatives. One in every four to friends. Among men, the number who applied less than that of women. Men are more used to solve their problems independently. Lung cancer contributes greatly to this topic. Every tenth of all believes that he will cope with their own problems. Probably why the crisis has had more women harmful effects.
Any shock always knocks people out of our usual ruts, reduces its ability to handle stress. A crisis seriously affected the psyche of people around the world. This is very dangerous for the human psyche. Constant thoughts about work, family welfare, bad news on television and in the media. This affects the state of the human body. Begin headaches, irritability, fatigue and insomnia. This is just some of the symptoms of psychological disorder. Therefore it is necessary to filter out information that does not succumb to the newspaper ducks seeking inflate the sensation of petty events. Learn how to find all positive. All that is done, all the better. Those who live by this principle, the least susceptible to psychological influence from outside. Do not discuss the bad news circle of friends. It is not necessary to escalate the situation. Leave the negative beyond the threshold. Make every effort to confidence in the future. Confidence and ability to always increase your stress levels. Make plan economically feasible costs. Order them. Because you can not do something, not very compromising yourself. Realize, finally, that the crisis – a temporary phenomenon. This is not the end of life. And try to find positive aspects in this situation. People who have passed through the crucible of hardship, only hardened. Be persistent and you, like a fairytale soldier of tin.
MARTINS, Carlos Benedict. What it is sociology. So Paulo: Brasiliense, 2006. Carlos Benedict Martins, author of the workmanship ' ' What it is Sociology? ' ' , he is sociologist graduated and master Social Sciences for the PUC of So Paulo, beyond doctor in sociology for the University of Paris. Hodiernamente, acts in the practical professor and research in the Department of Sociology of the University of Brasilia (UnB), more specifically in the areas of Sociological Theory and Sociology of the Education.
It is, still, researcher of the CNPq. In synthesis, the workmanship problematiza the sociological question searching the factors motivadores of the sprouting and the affirmation of sociology while science. Martins makes a historical boarding in order to contextualizar and to become visible elements that are not clarividentes, but that they had influenced strong and they are closely linked to the appearance of new science, of the science of the people in the collective scope properly said. The book is divided in: ' ' Introduction; First chapter: sprouting; Chapter second: The formation; Chapter third: The development; Indications for leitura' '. In the first item, ' ' Introduo' ' , the author presents the workmanship and clarifies its pretensions with this. It makes one brief communication concerning what it configures sociology in its essence, of which its objectives while science, of its relation with the capitalist rising society, of its initial experience in the universities and later the prohibition of the education of the same one. In addition, the author deals with the mistake, that is perhaps even though proposital, to equal or to take the sociology as .causing of the marxism and Theory of the Revolution, therefore for the capitalism he is not nothing interesting that the proletariat is organized and mobilized for its rights and sociology was despertando the capacity of criticidade of the mass. The ruling class, bourgeoisie, desired to verwhelm sociology and tried to convince others that this optimum age.