Thus becoming the philosophy of queen of sciences to that it presents clear symptoms of autism or serious psychotic riot. What we do not want. As I am not of the opinion nor of the generation that wants to be known as closed the dialogues and the form established in the memorandum of understanding of education and ticket of philosophy I act as a lawyer vehemently that the philosophy can have its necessity and still serve for something since that either convicta of that needs and for yesterday of if adjusting what is said today and using of its past to compose the gift and to think the future as make all other sciences in innumerable areas of knowing. Not of more sacralizar philosophers to keep unbroken its descontextualizadas teses and nor more to want purismo of speech. We have that forming in them and entering in the ingredient of the great cake that is the understanding of our reality giving not only palpites, but considering ways and plans that pass of a retoricidade for a good and aprazvel rhetoric, in more direct words, we have and we can be more active. Without this transformation, without this dolorida kafkiana metamorphosis (the approach with literature is an excellent way) we will be, of a time for all, descompensada and disarmed species for the world, in harder words: parts not so attractive of museum. It does not advance to give a F5 in the philosophy as it was, therefore the philosophy as before it has its days already all counted ones and our way is if to adapt as Arnaldo would say Antunes at inspired moment, who knows for the proper sensation that the philosophy, for what it represented and already made still can give some contribution, but since that she is new, what it has been seen for there since spring in Arabia until Brazil where a left each day more is accused with right. what we will say the respect? We will repeat Maquiavel or elaborate speeches that are without pretension to understand the reality all, but the multiple contexts surround that it? Now choice question is alone and I twist very so that philosophy does not turn a fossil stranger forgotten as lost link some age human being I twist very exactly! Eustquio Jose.. For even more details, read what Jimmy John Liautaud says on the issue. Emma Lasry may find this interesting as well.